Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to companies as good citizens, concerned with the welfare of society and not just the owners. CSR is based on fairness, integrity and respect. While a company’s loyalty and obligation is to its owners, being a good corporate citizen can increase profitability in the long run. Companies with a good CSR reputation are cosidered ethical and often attract and retain better employees, enjoy greater employee loyalty, and draw more customers.
There are a variety of methods for CSR, including corporate philanthropy, corporate social initiatives, corporate responsibility and corporate policy. In addition to money, many companies allow their employees to volunteer during company time.
We know that companies have a responsibility to customers, pleasing them by offering real value. All things being equal, customers tend to favor the socially conscious company over its less socially conscious competitors. In fact, customers are often willing to pay more for goods from the socially responsible company. Thus CSR is also a tool to attract new customers. The question then becomes, how to make customers aware. Social media has become a low-cost, efficient way of conveying a company’s CSR efforts, allowing companies to reach and interact with a broad and diverse audience. However the company must live up to its hype or face dire consequences. If a company does not follow through on its CSR as claimed, it loses customers’ trust; customers do not want to do business with a company they don’t trust.
Many investors also believe that it makes financial sense to invest in companies engaged in CSR , and that ethical behavior adds to the bottom line.
Companies that treat their employees with respect usually earn the respect of their employees. This mutual respect can have a significant impact on the company’s profit. Retaining good employees saves money, is good for business and also good for morale. A disgruntled employee can wreak havoc on a business, thus loss of employee commitment, confidence and trust in the company can be extremely costly.
CSR has many benefits, each of which can increase a company’s profitability while also doing good for society as a whole.
Part 2 – Management’s role in setting ethical standards
Ethics isn’t so much taught as it is picked up vicariously. We tend to learn our standards and values based on observing what others do, not what they say. Organizational ethics begins at the top, with leadership and strong managers helping to instill corporate values in employees.
Intra-company relationships should be based on fairness, honesty, openness and moral integrity. Trust and cooperation between workers and managers is built on these foundational structures. The same applies to business-to-business relations as well. Businesses managed ethically often enjoy many benefits, such as maintaining a good reputation, keeping existing customers and attracting new ones, avoiding lawsuits, reducing employee turnover, pleasing customers and employees, and simply doing the right thing.
While some managers think ethics is a personal matter, having nothing to do with management, and that they are not responsible for their employee’s misdeeds, the business environment has moved the other way, that ethics has everything to do with management. There is recognition that individuals typically don’t act alone, they need the direct, or even implied, cooperation of others to behave unethically within a corporation. For example, poorly designed incentive programs might reward employees for meeting certain goals, and in order to meet these goals they need to act in their own best interests rather than the best interests of the customers. Here the message is clear, while their managers don’t directly say to deceive customers, overly ambitious goals and incentives can create an environment in which unethical actions are likely to occur.
A popular trend is that companies are adopting written codes of ethics. While these codes vary greatly, they fall within two broad categories: compliance-based and integrity-based. Compliance-based codes emphasize preventing unlawful behavior by increasing control and penalizing wrongdoers, while integrity-based codes define the organization’s guiding values, create an environment supportive of ethically sound behavior, and stress shared accountability. Stated differently, integrity-based codes of ethics go beyond legal compliance and create an environment emphasizing core values such as honesty, fair play, good customer service, a commitment to diversity and community involvement.
Business ethics should include the following: 1. Top management should adopt and unconditionally support a written code of conduct. 2. Employees must understand expectations for ethical behavior, that it comes from the top, and that senior management expects all employees to act accordingly. 3. Managers and other key personnel must receive training on the ethical implications of business decisions. 4. The company should create an ethics office, where employees can communicate freely. Make it clear to employees that whistleblowers are protected from retaliation. 5. Pressure to ignore ethics programs often comes from the outside. Help employees to resist such pressure by ensuring outsiders such as suppliers, subcontractors, distributors, customers, etc. are aware of the company’s ethical standards. 6. The code of ethics must be timely enforced if violated.
Enforcement might be the most critical component, it communicates to employees that the code is serious; a company’s code of ethics is worthless if not enforced. Select an effective ethics officer to set a positive tone, communicate effectively, and relate well with all levels of employees. The ethics officer should be comfortable in the roles of counselor and investigator, should be trusted to maintain confidentiality, conduct objective investigations, and ensure fairness. This demonstrates to stakeholders that ethics is important in eveything the company does.
COVID-19 has caused us to take a deeper look at many of our business practices, including the physical workplace, business plans, and emergency contingency plans. Business contracts are another area that need review.
Business agreements routinely include boiler plate language, such as a force majeure clause. This language protects the parties in the event of an unlikely circumstance that would significantly impair either or both parties’ ability to perform, such as fire, war, flooding, earthquake and the like. While these clauses have rarely been relevant, the pandemic requires us to take another look.
One of the benefits of force majeure clauses is that they protect a party that is unable to perform from claims of breach of contract and related damages resulting from non-performance. The events listed in force majeure clauses differ from a breach of contract scenario because the party did not choose to not perform, rather circumstances beyond its control caused its inability and thus failure to perform.
If your business cannot perform under a contract due to COVID-19, either because of the virus itself or the government’s response to it (shelter in place orders, quarantine or other governmental restraints), look at your existing contracts to determine whether each has a force majeure clause and, if so, whether it is broad enough to include the current pandemic, and how the parties agreed to proceed in the event the clause is triggered. If there is no force majeure clause, or if it is not broad enough to cover COVID-19, there are other legal defenses that can help you, such as frustration of purpose and impracticability.
And while force majeure clauses and other defenses may be available, the best first strategy is to communicate with the other party to the agreement. Using common sense, issues related to non-performance or inability to perfom can hopefully be resolved without resorting to legal action.
Until now, virus, pandemic, quarantine and the like have not typically been listed in force majeure clauses. Many businesses are taking the time now to update their contracts to include such circumstances as a hedge against future unknowns.
Part 1 -The responsibility of businesses to their stakeholders: customers, investors, employees and society
Mover/entrepreneur Aaron Steed recognizes that “it [isn’t] so much about how we moved furniture, it was about how we made our clients feel.” This young man understands that the customers’ experience is critical, and in fact it is that same attitude that has led to the huge success of his moving company.
Aaron and his brother, Evan, of Meathead Movers, early in their young business, began moving women out of domestic abuse situations for free. They also implemented a policy of hiring student athletes: respectful, clean-cut, drug-free. These ethical entrepreneurs are moved by each call they receive from a domestic abuse survivor thanking them for turning something so bad into a celebration of moving to their new homes and new lives. And this, in turn, has led executives and employees of domestic abuse centers to recommend Meathead Movers throughout their local non-profit community, resulting in huge growth for the business.
Ethics is more than legality. A society gets into trouble when people consider only what is illegal and not also what is unethical. Ethics and legality are two very different things. Although following the law is an important first step, behaving ethically requires more than that. Ethics reflects people’s proper relationships with one another: How should we treat others? What responsibility should we feel for others? Legality is narrower; it refers to laws we have written to protect ourselves from fraud, theft and violence. Many immoral and unethical acts are legal nonethless.
We define ethics as society’s accepted standards of moral behavior; behaviors accepted by society as right rather than wrong. Many people have few moral absolutes, deciding on a situation by situation basis. They seem to think that what is right is whatever works best for them, that each person has to work out for himself the difference between right and wrong. This thinking may be part of the behavior that has led to scandals in both government and business.
This is not the way it always was. In the United States, for example, with so many diverse cultures, it might seem impossible to identify common standards of ethical behavior. But this is not true. Common statements of moral values include integrity, respect for human life, self-control, honesty, courage and self-sacrifice. Cheating, cowardice and cruelty are commonly deemed wrong. And of course there is Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Ethics begins with each of us. It is easy to criticize business and political leaders for moral and ethical shortcomings. Managers and workers often cite low managerial ethics as a major cause of US businesses’ competitive problems. But employees also frequently violate safety standards, or goof off during the work week. Adults in general are not always as honest or honorable as they should be. Even though volunteerism is at an all time high, 75% of our population do not give any time to the community in which they live. Plagiarism is the most common form of cheating today. And while most teens believe they are prepared to make ethical decisions in the workplace, more than half of high school students admit they have cheated on tests in the past year. Studies have found a strong relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty.
Choices are not always easy, and the obvious ethical solution may have personal or professional drawbacks. Aaron and Evan Steed were young entrepreneurs, scraping by, yet due to their sense of right and wrong decided to offer free services to domestic abuse survivors. Non-paying customers certainly pose drawbacks, especially for a new enterprise. But their ethical convictions not only lead them to doing good, it also resulted in them doing well.
It can be difficult to balance ethics with other goals, such as pleasing stakeholders or advancing your career. These three questions may help: Is my proposed action legal; does it violate any law or company policy? Is it balanced; am I acting fairly; would I want to be treated this way; will I win at the expense of another? And how will it make me feel about myself?
Remember, doing well by doing good is a good thing.
We are navigating uncharted territory: COVID-19 the virus, the economic fallout, the government assistance programs. It seems that the SBA’s assistance programs, including PPP and EILD, change daily, maybe even hourly. This New York Times article from yesterday provides answers to frequently asked questions for small businesses, freelancers and more.
We are here if you need us, please reach out and we will do what we can to help you through these difficult times.
We are experiencing unprecedent times in connection with COVID-19 – social distancing, business closures, mental and physical health concerns, school closings, and more. We have likely all been inundated with emails, posts and the news about the pandemic, the numbers, the expected numbers, etc. Of the numerous articles I’ve read about the various financial assistance programs, most of which are extremely confusing, this one lays it out well. It explains the available programs for small businesses and non-profits, collectively referred to as the CARES Act. Please feel free to reach out if we can answer any of your questions or concerns, or otherwise be of assistance.
We’ve seen notices from just about every type of business, delivered in just about every way imaginable, outlining the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. I think we can all agree, this is a crisis. So it’s time to review some basic, and oft forgotten, principles of crisis communications.
Be honest. This one’s pretty easy, especially in states where non-essential businesses are shut down. Outline what, if any, service you’re still able to provide, and how to access it for the time being. If response times are going to be slower, set realistic expectations. This will help both your clients and your employees.
Stay in your lane. Let’s leave the science to the scientists, folks. Don’t explain the virus. Whatever you say today, even if it is correct, will be old news tomorrow anyway. When you speak, speak about your business. And don’t predict when or how you’ll be able to return to normal, until we all really know when and how we’ll be able to return to normal.
Stay professional. You have a brand for you business. Make sure everything you’re saying now, including what you say, how you say it, when you say it, and what channels you use, consistently reflects your established brand.
Here’s the big one — this is actually a chance to enhance your client relationships, and perhaps pave the way for some new ones. You need to be balanced, and don’t come across as mercenary, but anything you can offer online, at advantageous cost structures, any message you can give about how you serve your community now and when normal returns, is important. Don’t just focus on doom and gloom — remind everyone we’ll see each other on the other side.
Make sure you keep 1 through 3 in mind when you work on number 4!
If you’re having trouble crafting your message, try contacting a reputable crisis communications team for help. We’re happy to give you our recommendations if you reach out to us on our website.
The business environment is the surrounding factors that either help or hinder business development. These include the economic and legal environment, the technological environment, the competitive environment, the social environment and the global business environment. Businesses that create wealth and jobs should grow and prosper in a healthy environment. Although businesses can’t control their environment, they should pay careful attention so they can adapt as it changes.
People are often willing to start new businesses if they believe the risk of losing their money is not too great. Both the economic system and the way the government works with or against businesses can have a strong impact on the risk level. For instance, government can actively promote entrepreneurship by allowing private ownership of businesses and passing laws that enable people to write enforceable contracts, among others. The Uniform Commercial Code is an example of laws that regulate business agreements such as contracts and warranties, thus allowing companies to know they can rely on one another.
Information technology has had the most comprehensive and lasting impact on businesses, and affects all industries. It has changed the way people communicate with one another, as well as created ways to reach suppliers and customers. Technology is a broad term including phones, computers, copiers, mobile devices, medical imaging machines, robots, the Internet, social media and software programs and apps that make business processes more effective, efficient and productive. Effectiveness means producing the desired result; efficiency is producing goods and services using the least amount of resources; and productivity is the amount of output you generate given the amount of input, e.g. number of hours worked. E-commerce, the buying and selling of goods online, is important in both the business-to-consumer and business-to-business markets.
Competition among businesses seems to be at an all time high. Some have found a competitive edge by focusing on quality which, when coupled with good value, i.e. oustanding service at competitive prices, allows them to stay competitive. Exceeding customer expectations is critical. Today’s consumers want not only good quality and low prices but great service as well. In the past business had been more management-driven, in today’s competitive environment it is more customer-driven. Successful businesses listen more closely to their customers’ wants and needs, then adjust their products, policies and practices accordingly. Part of this customer-oriented shift requires customer-facing workers to have greater responsibility, authority, freedom, training and equipment to respond quickly to customer requests. This empowerment allows frontline workers to provide the great service demanded by today’s consumers.
The U.S. population is going through significant changes that are dramatically affecting where and how people live, what they buy and how they spend their time. The social environment requires companies to manage diversity, including not only minorities and women, as in the past, but also older adults, people with disabilities, married people, singles, those with a different sexual orientation, atheists, extroverts, introverts, religious people, and immigrants, to name but a few. People aged 65-74 are currently the richest demographic in the country, thus representing a lucrative market for many companies. By 2030 the popluation 65 and older will increase by 20%, and by 2050 it will more than double. Products and services for middle-aged and elderly customers will provide excellent opportunities in the 21st century. The number of single parent families is also on the rise, which has had a major affect on businesses, such as encouraging family leave programs and flextime.
The novel coronavirus has generated incredible uncertainly in nearly every aspect of business and personal life. In researching possible insurance relief for several of our clients, we discovered some very challenging limitations to standard business insurance coverages, some of which surprised all of us. The following article from Law360 is particularly instructive, and we pass it along to you here.
By Jeff Sistrunk Law360 (March 13, 2020, 3:43 PM EDT) — Property and liability insurers are bracing for an uptick in claims across virtually every line of coverage due to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, as companies lose money by shutting down large-scale events and businesses face supply chain troubles.
Here, Law360 looks at four types of coverage that are especially ripe for disputes.
As the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 continues to rise in the U.S., high-profile event cancellations have become a near-daily occurrence. In the past week alone, the NBA, NHL and MLB all suspended their seasons, the NCAA cancelled its March Madness basketball tournament, and Disneyland shuttered its doors indefinitely.
Attorneys who spoke with Law360 said that since late last month, they have been inundated with inquiries from insurers and event organizers seeking guidance on disputes over coverage under event cancellation policies, which generally cover at least some of the policyholder’s lost revenues and out-of-pocket expenses.
These specialized policies almost always contain a list of covered causes, and attorneys said coverage for coronavirus-related cancellations may be available if the list includes communicable diseases or, even more specifically, pandemics. However, a policy won’t kick in if an organizer cancels merely due to the fear of coronavirus in the community, according to attorneys.
“These policies cannot respond to voluntary decisions not to go forward with an event or a disinclination to gather a group,” said Laura Foggan, chair of Crowell & Moring LLP’s insurance and reinsurance group, who represents insurers. “They are designed to respond in a case where there is a legal or physical impossibility of holding an event.”
Therefore, if an organizer cancels an event due to an official ban on large public gatherings, such as those recently announced by New York and California, they are more likely to be eligible for coverage. But most cancellation policies also require the policyholder to attempt to mitigate losses by, for instance, making a good-faith effort to reschedule the event before calling it off.
“Organizers have to be prudent businesspeople and do what they would do if they were not getting reimbursed,” said Lathrop GPM LLP partner Alexandra A. Roje, who represents policyholders. “Depending on the facts of the situation, you may be able to negotiate with your vendors or seek to reschedule. However, I can guarantee that if you’re not attempting to reschedule and you’re just throwing up your hands and saying ‘Okay, I’m going to refund everyone and then go chase my carrier,’ that is going to be a problem.”
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP partner David Klein said he has been in contact with conference organizers who reported they had recently purchased event cancellation policies with express communicable disease coverage for an additional premium. But according to Klein, upon receiving the policies, the organizers discovered they contained exclusions specifically for coronavirus — with no reduction in premium.
“That is a violation of state insurance regulations in every jurisdiction I know of,” said Klein, who counsels policyholders. “That is likely to be a litigated issue. It speaks of panic in the insurance industry that they’ve tried such a bait-and-switch.”
The COVID-19 outbreak has dealt a significant blow to the global economy, as many companies have had to temporarily shutter their own properties or experienced breaks in their supply chains.
Attorneys told Law360 that these economic woes have generated disputes over two types of commercial property insurance: business interruption coverage, which covers a policyholder’s losses from having to shut down abruptly, and contingent business interruption, which kicks in when losses result from the closure of a policyholder’s supplier.
For either type of insurance to apply, there must be proof of a “direct physical loss” to a property — in the case of business interruption coverage, the policyholder’s property, or in the case of contingent business interruption, the supplier’s property.
If a property has been shuttered merely due to fears of the coronavirus, but the building remains habitable, the direct physical loss requirement won’t be met, according to attorneys.
“We’re shutting down as a global community not because property is impaired but because people are impaired,” said Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP partner Paul S. White, who represents insurers. “The practical nature is that there may be some direct physical damage or physical loss to some property, but it is probably going to be the exception to have a direct physical loss rather than the rule.”
If, however, an infected person has been inside of a property and physically contaminated it, that may be enough to meet the direct physical loss requirement, attorneys said.
“The ongoing research on COVID-19 indicates it may last longer in environments that are not hospitable, so it is possible that this will be a livelier coverage issue than it has been in the past,” said Klein.
Even if the initial threshold for a direct physical loss is met, though, the policyholder could run into other problems depending on the wording of their policy. Some commercial property policies with business interruption coverage contain exclusions for property damage arising from pathogens, bacteria, viruses and other disease-causing agents.
“Those may very well come into play in a scenario in which an infected person has been inside of a property, if that could somehow otherwise trigger coverage,” Foggan said.
Workers’ compensation insurers could soon face an influx of claims from workers who say they contracted COVID-19 while on the job.
A recent report by Michel Leonard of the nonprofit Insurance Information Institute predicted that workers’ comp providers would be one of two categories of insurers to experience the greatest impact from the coronavirus pandemic, along with health insurers. According to the report, the brunt of that impact will be felt by carriers providing workers’ comp coverage to hospital workers, EMTs, police officers and firefighters, as well as workers in “high-risk” sectors such as entertainment, manufacturing, transportation and retail.
Attorneys told Law360 that the success of these workers’ comp claims will depend on whether the employees’ exposure to the virus was sufficiently tied to their work. That test is known as “work relatedness.”
“Generally speaking, cases in which an employee is exposed to coronavirus onsite likely wouldn’t be considered workers’ comp cases, unless the exposure was sufficiently intertwined with the job,” Foggan said. “This is already true of situations in which an employee catches a cold or the flu.”
In the case of first responders, it should be fairly easy to demonstrate work relatedness, given that they regularly deal with populations that are more vulnerable to infection, according to attorneys. But for other workers, even those in customer-facing roles, it may be more of an uphill battle for them to prove that their exposure to the coronavirus occurred at work.
“In this situation, it may be difficult to trace the origin of the illness,” Klein said.
General liability insurance carriers will likely be pulled into the fray as companies face lawsuits over allegedly failing to protect customers from the coronavirus.
On March 9, Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. was hit with a first-of-its-kind suit by a South Florida couple who claimed the cruise company acted with gross negligence by failing to take precautions to prevent a coronavirus outbreak on one of its ships after two passengers on the previous sailing disembarked with symptoms. According to attorneys, similar litigation is almost certain to follow as the pandemic unfolds.
“All companies I know of are thinking about protocols to minimize harm, and a failure to do so may give rise to liability,” said Klein. “For example, now that many colleges and universities have decided to end classroom instruction, any college that is a laggard in adopting that approach could later be viewed as negligent.”
Claims of negligence resulting in bodily injury typically fall under “Coverage A” of standard general liability policies. However, one of the prerequisites for coverage under that prong is that there be an accidental “occurrence,” and some plaintiffs may say that companies deliberately ignored critical information that could have prevented the spread of coronavirus.
“You will definitely see a debate around whether there was an accident in these types of cases,” said McCarter & English LLP partner Sheri Pastor, who is president-elect of the American College of Coverage Counsel, an association of insurance attorneys.
Pastor said that, depending on the circumstances, companies may also be able to turn to “Coverage B” of their general liability policies, which includes coverage for the personal injury offenses of false detention and imprisonment.
“If a person alleges they were improperly detained and quarantined, that coverage could definitely apply,” Pastor said.
Even if a company succeeds in triggering coverage under one or both prongs of a general liability policy, some insurers may invoke standard exclusions for claims of property damage or bodily injury stemming from exposure to a “pollutant” or “contaminant,” as courts could read those terms broadly enough to encompass the coronavirus.
“The premises liability situation could be one in which a pollution or contamination exclusion could be implicated,” Foggan said.